Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Autoplay driver not public. Unfair why?

Author: Mark Young

Date: 15:45:42 06/02/98

Could someone explain why Fritz 5, or any other company, is required to
make their autoplayer public? I keep reading about a gentelmen's
agreement, and vague statements about unfairness. What agreement was
made, and who made it?

Re: Autoplay driver not public. Unfair why? Komputer Korner 21:05:56 06/02/98
- Re: Autoplay driver not public. Unfair why? Mark Young 16:56:40 06/03/98
  - Re: Autoplay driver not public. Unfair why? Harald Faber 02:12:20 06/04/98
    - Re: Autoplay driver not public. Unfair why? Mark Young 18:29:07 06/04/98
      - Re: Autoplay driver not public. Unfair why? Komputer Korner 22:12:16 06/04/98
        
        Re: Autoplay driver not public. Unfair why? Mark Young 17:56:08 06/05/98
        
        Let's build a public domain autotester. Don Dailey 08:19:06 06/05/98
        
        Re: Let's build a public domain autotester. Komputer Korner 08:38:28 06/05/98
        
        Re: Let's build a public domain autotester. Danniel Corbit 08:51:50 06/05/98
    - Re: Autoplay driver not public. Unfair why? Guido Schimmels 07:10:18 06/04/98
- Re: Autoplay driver not public. Unfair why? Don Dailey 08:40:26 06/03/98

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.