Author: Ralf Elvsén
Date: 06:51:41 11/21/01
Go up one level in this thread
On November 21, 2001 at 08:45:14, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >On November 21, 2001 at 04:33:10, Ralf Elvsén wrote: > >>I think it's silly to limit if the absence of a limit doesn't cost >>anything > >Try this > >8/8/pppppppK/NBBR1NRp/nbbrqnrP/PPPPPPPk/8/Q7 w - - 0 1 Will check at home :) > >>If one has a SEE maybe one can use the value of this function at some >>stage of course to limit the qsearch. > >Wont help, see above. SEE can only consider same-square captures. > >-- >GCP What I meant was: to use the SEE function to guess the best value must surely be better than to just cut off the search at a certain depth. The latter procedure has no accuracy at all? Ralf
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.