Author: Rafael Andrist
Date: 11:28:28 11/21/01
Go up one level in this thread
On November 21, 2001 at 08:45:14, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >On November 21, 2001 at 04:33:10, Ralf Elvsén wrote: > >>I think it's silly to limit if the absence of a limit doesn't cost >>anything > >Try this > >8/8/pppppppK/NBBR1NRp/nbbrqnrP/PPPPPPPk/8/Q7 w - - 0 1 > >>If one has a SEE maybe one can use the value of this function at some >>stage of course to limit the qsearch. > >Wont help, see above. SEE can only consider same-square captures. > >-- >GCP Other recommendation: if you recognize that the qsearch is going very deep, skip it and set an "unclear" flag. Search the rest and only if the unclear subtree rests in the window, search it again and now completely. Rafael B. Andrist
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.