Author: Otello Gnaramori
Date: 14:46:11 11/25/01
Go up one level in this thread
On November 25, 2001 at 13:26:48, Christophe Theron wrote: >On November 25, 2001 at 11:48:14, Victor Fernandez wrote: > >>On November 25, 2001 at 11:21:11, Steve Maughan wrote: >> >>>There is no doubt that Tiger is better than WChess (using equal hardware) so I >>>don't think your question is appropriate. I don't really think you even believe >>>that WChess on a P90 would beat Kramnik by a ratio of 2:1 in a series of 100 >>>tournament games i.e. has a rating of 2895. A better question would be why did >>>WChess in 1994 get such a high performance rating? The answer probably lies >>>with the GM who most likely underestimated the strength or had an off day. >> >>My question is appropriate. The programmers develop their work cuting >>code, so that its program runs quicker, and this way to be able to conquer to >>other programs, but they don't look for a better evaluation algorithm . > > > >As I am the programmer of Tiger I think I can answer you. > >I spend all my time improving the intelligence of Tiger's evaluation and search >algorithms, and I think in this regard my program has progressed a lot in the >last years. > >As have almost all the other commercial and amateur chess programs. > >You have obviously absolutely no idea about the progress of chess programs. >Actually you seem to know almost nothing about chess programs. > >Your comparison between the performance of WChess and Tiger and the conclusions >you draw from this are simply irrelevant. > >You either do not know what you are talking about, or you just want to troll. > >Get real. > > > > Christophe Christophe, I hope that moderators will assign to this new entry that deserved "prize"... Regards, Otello.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.