Author: James T. Walker
Date: 06:31:26 11/27/01
Go up one level in this thread
On November 27, 2001 at 06:40:10, Chessfun wrote: >On November 27, 2001 at 02:22:50, Jouni Uski wrote: > >>On November 27, 2001 at 01:56:53, Sandro Necchi wrote: >> >>>On November 26, 2001 at 15:19:36, Harald Faber wrote: >>> >>>>On November 26, 2001 at 02:03:50, Sandro Necchi wrote: >>>> >>>>>On November 26, 2001 at 01:16:54, Harald Faber wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>The Match finished by 6.0-4.0 in favour of Fritz 7b after 4 wins in a row (games >>>>>>6-9). The result "fits" to the other Shredder 5.32 results in my test. Shredder >>>>>>does not fulfill the expectations a WorldChampion program evokes. >>>>> >>>>>Shredder 6 will:-) >>>>> >>>>>Sandro >>>> >>>>Sorry for my doubts, but there have also been other programmers who claimed that >>>>their baby performed 60% or more vs the other competitors and finally ranked >>>>no.7 or so in SSDF. >>>> >>>>Do you think that the engine has made enormous progress or your book tuning will >>>>help Shredder play stronger not only in WCh? >>> >>>Well, Shredder 6 will be available in one or two weeks. >>>We have made several test games and the final picture was at least 100 points >>>stronger. >>>So, it seems to me that it should be stronger between 80 to 100 points. >>> >> >>Do You really believe, what You are writing?! I think we have gone off from >>these 100 points improvement... When in reality You may be got 5-10 points or >>even negative gain: examples Nimzo, Gandalf. > >Gandalf ? have you seen this; >http://www.icdchess.com/forums/1/message.shtml?199145 > >And I know Gandalf 5 is stronger maybe not 80-100 points, >but I would guess 40-50. > >Sarah. ?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.