Author: Andrew Williams
Date: 09:56:24 11/28/01
Go up one level in this thread
On November 27, 2001 at 15:49:23, Dann Corbit wrote: >On November 23, 2001 at 19:33:15, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > >>On November 23, 2001 at 19:21:23, Andrew Williams wrote: >> >>>I've just spoken to Vincent Diepeveen on ICC and he says that gnuchess was >>>also running on the same machine as diep, so you shouldn't necessarily take >>>this performance as indicative of diep's true strength. This would certainly >>>explain why PM vs Diep today finished +3 =1 -0 in favour of PM! >>> >>>Andrew >> >>Diep ran with Pesce book. Say what you want, but diep was 550Mhz before >>this and then diep scored better against PM. So probably both PM >>improved and Pesce book is strategically not giving what DIEP likes. > >Does a post-mortem analysis show that Diep was negative falling out of book? I don't know, but Diep won the next four games against PostModernist! Andrew
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.