Author: David Hanley
Date: 16:00:32 11/28/01
Go up one level in this thread
On November 28, 2001 at 16:15:04, K. Burcham wrote: >yes true. but it my game analysis, my eval swings much more with GM or super GM >games in comparison to comp vs comp games. a very high percentage of the GM >games have large enough eval swings for move to be called a blunder. i am >refering here to standard games not blitz or lightning. Ah, but that proves nothing. It could easily be the computer missing things the super GM is seeing. Maybe the computer thinks this passed pawn will win while the GM knows the attack will get through first, etc. So the GM doesn't go for the passer and the computer's eval swings. dave
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.