Author: Janosch Zwerensky
Date: 11:03:06 12/13/01
Go up one level in this thread
>I disagree here. >If someone can find a way to teach programs to plan in similiar way to humans >GMs they can be better than the best humans. If someone would find a way to have their program do GM-level chess reasoning in real time, they'd probably indeed get a very strong program. I just doubt that this is doable with currently available computing hardware and I also doubt that on hardware that is powerful enough to allow one to implement GM-like chess reasoning there are no simpler ways of building a program that performs better at OTB chess than any human grandmaster. > >Computers sre faster then GM's I doubt that this holds for complex pattern recognition tasks, with currently available computers. > and I believe that they can be better in every >thinking game that humans play. I think it is very plausible that _some day_ computers will outrun humans at any game. However, I am aware of no reason to believe that only with software improvements we could, in principle, have a machine becoming the Go world champion, for example. > >I believe that a GM who is a good programmer and understand what he knows can do >the best program. > >The last part is the hardest part and I doubt if there is a human >who understand what he knows. Here I agree with you again. Regards, janosch.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.