Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: DIAMOND/NOVAG/RISC/AS A REFERENCE MODEL.

Author: Fernando Villegas

Date: 11:59:40 06/08/98

Go up one level in this thread


On June 08, 1998 at 11:37:41, Vincent Diepeveen wrote:

>On June 07, 1998 at 18:04:01, William Dozier wrote:
>
>>Good day everyone: I have had the DIAMOND NOVAG for about two years and
>>so far i have not been sorry that i brought it. It is worth every dollar
>>that i spent for it and some and it is fast. It has beaten SARGON V FOR
>>the Mac, it has beaten crafty on numerious times. It has beaten MacChess
>>PPc Version 3, 4. it has beaten RadioShack 2150. It has not beaten
>>Hiarcs 60. It is interesting to note that the program for the DIAMOND
>>NOVAG by the same people who wrote the program for Hiarcs. So any
>>program that cannot beat it, its a weak program, that is why i called it
>>a refeerence chess standalone, where as i guage other strong chess
>>programs.
>
>How old is that mac, like an XT or something?
>
>Don't run new programs at old hardware. current programs are designed
>for
>pentium cpu, so they expect to get a certain depth at least.
>
>You can therefore never benchmark a an old chesscomputer, because it
>gets
>badly outsearched when playing against the pentium.
>
>When a program gets badly outsearched, then it's hard to compare
>results.
>
>For example, nimzo is an excellent blitz program, and at blitz level it
>makes
>meat out of Diep, and the rest of the world (at equal hardware using
>auto232
>and not the internet).
>
>Yet if i give diep 2.2 times faster hardware (pentium 133
>versus Pentium Pro), then nimzo gets wiped from earth.


Hi Diep:
Could you post here the games where as you say Diep wiped out of the
earth Nimzo?
Greerings from the rain
Fernando

>

>Nimzo is for its play depending on speed. So as soon as it does not have
>its
>advantage (namely it sees tactical way more at blitz at same hardware),
>then results suddenly say nothing, because besides its positional weaker
>play
>it then also sees tactical not more, so that's a walk over.
>
>If i interpret this well, then you can never depend on an old computer
>to see how well a program plays, because there is hardly difference
>between
>a result of 8.5-1.5 and 9.5-0.5, when not running at comparable
>hardware.
>
>Greetings,
>Vincent



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.