Author: Mike S.
Date: 11:44:06 12/16/01
Go up one level in this thread
On December 16, 2001 at 13:59:30, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >On December 16, 2001 at 10:54:20, CLiebert wrote: > >You present it as gambittiger, whereas 300 rating points of >the thing are the user who operates it. playing with random >book turned on is a sure zero. > >nevertheless in CSS you go post it as 'gambittiger' not as the >idiot who operates it. Ok so you say somebody who lets GT play Caro-Kann is an idiot. Remarkable. But any user can use any opening he wants IMO, if it suits the program or not. This is not an adventurous gambit opening, but a major opening. You probably do not know, it was agreed for that tournament that users have full freedom of choosing any book they want and/or edit it as desired. This isn't an exhibition of "out of the box"-versions (although this might be a good idea for another occasion). Obviously you think Gambit Tiger is "weakened" when it must play 1.e4 c6, please explain why. Regards, M.Scheidl
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.