Author: Pham Minh Tri
Date: 18:50:33 12/20/01
Go up one level in this thread
Commercial programs are easy to understand and define. But how do you define a program is an amateur? By developing time? Some people have been developing their programs for tens years and may be longer than some commercial programmers. Part time work? I think some commercial programmers have other works than chess programming only. Debuging effort? I am sure non-professional people has to pay more efforts for debuging than professional one. Open source? Many non-commercial programs are not open source. Amateur term seems not to be good enough to define many programs. Should we divice chess programs into commercial and non-commercial groups instead of amateur?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.