Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Commercial program strength vs. amateur program strength

Author: Georg v. Zimmermann

Date: 05:50:03 12/21/01

Go up one level in this thread


On December 21, 2001 at 08:35:27, Uri Blass wrote:

>On December 21, 2001 at 08:05:16, Bernhard Bauer wrote:
>
>>On December 21, 2001 at 05:33:51, Georg v. Zimmermann wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Of course. The difference is the amount of time/energy one is ready to spend.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>    Christophe
>>>>
>>>>Well, based on your last two reples to my posts, you agree with me completely.
>>>>So why all the noise to Scott about how commercial programs use vastly
>>>>different/superior techniques than amateur programs?
>>>>
>>>>-Tom
>>>
>>>Tiger/Fritz etc. are a lot stronger in Comp/Comp than, for example, crafty.
>>
>>Tony Hedlund's match between F7 and Crafty ended 24:16 in favor of Fritz.
>>That means 70 points difference in a Comp/Comp match.
>>So we know what a lot means.
>
>This match was between Deep Fritz and Crafty and not between Fritz7 and Crafty.
>
>I also think that 24-16 means 80 elo and not 70 elo(I use the liear formula
>400*(24-16)/(24+16)=80.
>
>I believe that Fritz7a is more than 100 elo better than Crafty.
>
>Uri

40 games match.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.