Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Commercial program strength vs. amateur program strength

Author: Christophe Theron

Date: 09:19:31 12/21/01

Go up one level in this thread


On December 21, 2001 at 03:25:37, Tom Kerrigan wrote:

>On December 21, 2001 at 01:12:31, Dann Corbit wrote:
>
>>On December 21, 2001 at 00:42:22, Tom Kerrigan wrote:
>>[snip]
>>>If you spend your free time writing the program, then you don't need to be
>>>supported by the money that you make from it.
>>
>>It becomes harder and harder for this method of writing a chess program to
>>attain to world championship level.
>>
>>Ferret is the only amateur engine that has come close in the last few years.
>
>Who was talking about world championship level, and what do you consider "the
>last few years"? Junior, Shredder, and Tiger have become commercial fairly
>recently in my mind.
>-Tom



Do you consider spending 10-12 hours a day developping Tiger for 4 years before
reaching an acceptable level for commercialization as "spending your free time
developping your program"?



    Christophe



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.