Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Commercial program strength vs. amateur program strength

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 10:40:19 12/22/01

Go up one level in this thread


On December 22, 2001 at 11:34:41, Vincent Diepeveen wrote:

>On December 22, 2001 at 10:05:21, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>
>>On December 22, 2001 at 05:55:17, Otello Gnaramori wrote:
>>
>>>On December 22, 2001 at 00:07:53, Miguel A. Ballicora wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>IQ is like nps, you want to have a higher one, but that number alone
>>>>does not mean a thing.
>>>>
>>>>Regards,
>>>>Miguel
>>>
>>>You are right Miguel, infact Kaspy is a good example of that : he excels in
>>>chess , but his measured I.Q. is still far from genius level.
>>>He is well above the average, but no exceptional values, nevertheless combined
>>>with his outstanding memory capabilities (especially visual kind), his passion
>>>(Ed's factor) and constant training (Time factor) he reached the top of chess.
>>>
>>>
>>>w.b.r.
>>>Otello
>>
>>It actually works like this:  Being a good chess player does not mean you
>>have a high IQ.  But having a high IQ _does_ mean you can become a good
>>chess player.  IQ is about the ability to visualize, recognize patterns,
>>and so forth, all of which will help a chess player.
>
>Not at all i know some professors with 180 IQ who will forever suck at
>chess despite that they play it daily. I'm talking about 1100-1400 level
>here. Dutch rating.

I believe that they have not 180 IQ and that they did not try to learn seriously
the game.

If I could get a rating of above 2000 in the past and if I have a stable israeli
raing of 1950-2000 in the last years without learning chess seriously and
without a special talent for chess then I am sure that they also can do it.

I say without special talent for chess because I know that I cannot play one
game without seeing the board when weaker players than me can do it.

I say without learning chess seriously because I did not learn openings
seriously and my knowledge of opening theory is not better than the average 1800
player and I did not take lessons from good players.

I have experience of some hundreds of tournament games and except analyzing my
games with computers I did not do a lot of training.

Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.