Author: pavel
Date: 21:52:31 12/23/01
Go up one level in this thread
Interesting, Fritz doesnt even chose 47.Rb3 its analysis after 47.Rb3 is that white is loosing, and it doesnt have trouble to see that too. 1...Rxg2 2.Rd3 Rg3 3.Rd7 Rxh3 4.Rxc7+ Kxa6 5.Rh7 ³ (-0.57) depth: 8/17 00:00:00 83kN 1...Rxg2 2.Rd3 Rg3 3.Rd7 Rxh3 4.Rxc7+ Kxa6 5.Rh7 Rh2 6.Kd3 ³ (-0.57) depth: 9/20 00:00:00 111kN 1...Rxg2 2.Rd3 Rg3 3.Rd7 Rxh3 4.Rxc7+ Kxa6 5.Rh7 Rh2 6.Kd3 Kb5 7.Ke3 ³ (-0.63) depth: 10/20 00:00:00 202kN 1...Rxg2 2.Rd3 Rg3 3.Rd7 Rxh3 4.Rxc7+ Kxa6 5.Rh7 Rh2 6.Kd3 Kb5 7.Ke3 ³ (-0.63) depth: 11/21 00:00:00 350kN 1...Rxb3! ³ (-0.66) depth: 11/21 00:00:01 385kN 1...Rxb3! µ (-0.82) depth: 11/21 00:00:01 389kN 1...Rxb3 2.Kxb3 Kxa6 3.Kc4 Kb6 4.Kd4 Kb5 5.Kc3 c5 µ (-1.10) depth: 11/21 00:00:01 396kN 1...Rxb3-- µ (-0.82) depth: 12/19 00:00:01 404kN 1...Rxb3 2.Kxb3 Kxa6 3.Kc4 Kb6 4.Kd4 c5+ 5.Ke3 Kc7 6.Ke4 Kc6 ³ (-0.41) depth: 12/20 00:00:01 423kN 1...Rxg2 ³ (-0.44) depth: 12/22 00:00:01 583kN 1...Rxg2 ³ (-0.60) depth: 12/22 00:00:01 741kN 1...Rxg2 2.Rb5 Rc2+ 3.Kb4 Kxa6 4.Rh5 Rc1 5.Rxh4 c5+ 6.Ka4 Ra1+ 7.Kb3 Kb5 8.Rg4 Rh1 ³ (-0.38) depth: 13/26 00:00:05 2012kN 1...Rxb3 ³ (-0.41) depth: 13/26 00:00:06 2070kN 1...Rxb3 ³ (-0.57) depth: 13/26 00:00:06 2078kN 1...Rxb3 µ (-0.88) depth: 13/26 00:00:06 2089kN 1...Rxb3 2.Kxb3 Kxa6 3.Kc4 Kb6 4.Kd4 Kb5 5.Kd3 Kc5 µ (-1.25) depth: 13/26 00:00:06 2120kN 1...Rxb3! -+ (-1.54) depth: 14/19 00:00:08 2196kN 1...Rxb3 2.Kxb3 Kxa6 3.Kc4 Kb6 4.Kd4 c5+ 5.Ke3 c4 6.Kd4 Kb5 7.Ke3 Kc5 -+ (-1.66) depth: 14/23 00:00:08 2236kN 1...Rxb3 2.Kxb3 Kxa6 3.Kc4 Kb6 4.Kb4 c5+ 5.Kb3 Kc6 6.Kc4 Kd6 7.Kc3 Kd5 8.Kd3 -+ (-1.60) depth: 15/25 00:00:10 2486kN 1...Rxb3 2.Kxb3 Kxa6 3.Kc4 Kb6 4.Kb4 c5+ 5.Kb3 Kc6 6.Kc4 Kd6 7.Kc3 Kd5 8.Kd3 c4+ -+ (-1.60) depth: 16/27 00:00:13 2907kN 1...Rxb3 2.Kxb3 Kxa6 3.Kc4 Kb6 4.Kb4 c5+ 5.Kb3 Kc6 6.Kc4 Kd6 7.Kc3 Kd5 -+ (-1.60) depth: 17/29 00:00:18 3786kN 1...Rxb3! -+ (-1.88) depth: 18/27 00:00:23 5272kN 1...Rxb3! -+ (-2.16) depth: 18/27 00:00:24 5397kN 1...Rxb3! -+ (-2.72) depth: 18/27 00:00:24 5514kN 1...Rxb3! 2.Kxb3 Kxa6 3.Kc4 Kb6 4.Kb4 c5+ 5.Kb3 Kb5 -+ (-3.82) depth: 18/33 00:00:26 5840kN 1...Rxb3! -+ (-4.10) depth: 19/26 00:00:34 8366kN 1...Rxb3! -+ (-4.38) depth: 20/28 00:00:50 13197kN 1...Rxb3! -+ (-4.66) depth: 20/28 00:00:51 13509kN 1...Rxb3! -+ (-5.22) depth: 20/29 00:00:52 13906kN 1...Rxb3! -+ (-5.50) depth: 21/31 00:01:21 22491kN 1...Rxb3! -+ (-5.79) depth: 21/32 00:01:26 24125kN 1...Rxb3! -+ (-6.35) depth: 21/32 00:01:29 25171kN 1...Rxb3! 2.Kxb3 Kxa6 3.Kc4 Kb6 4.Kb4 c5+ 5.Kc4 Kc6 6.Kc3 Kd5 7.Kd3 c4+ 8.Ke3 Kc5 -+ (-7.07) depth: 21/37 00:01:42 28293kN 1...Rxb3! -+ (-7.35) depth: 22/34 00:02:31 44197kN 1...Rxb3 2.Kxb3 Kxa6 3.Kc4 Kb6 4.Kb4 c5+ 5.Kc4 Kc6 6.Kc3 Kb5 -+ (-7.47) depth: 22/39 00:02:47 48647kN 1...Rxb3! -+ (-7.75) depth: 23/37 00:04:06 75027kN (Mahamood, home 24.12.2001) ---------------------------------------- here is the analysis before 47.Rb3 1.Rxb3 Rxg2 2.Re3 Rg3 3.Re7 Rxh3 4.Rxc7+ Kxa6 5.Rh7 Rh2 6.Kd3 ³ (-0.62) depth: 10/21 00:00:00 180kN 1.Rxb3 Rxg2 2.Re3 Rg3 3.Re7 Rxh3 4.Rxc7+ Kxa6 5.Rc6+ Kb7 6.Rh6 Rh2 7.Kd3 ³ (-0.68) depth: 11/21 00:00:00 291kN 1.Rxb3-- µ (-0.96) depth: 12/23 00:00:00 491kN 1.Rxb3 Rxb3 2.Kxb3 Kxa6 3.Kc4 Kb6 4.Kd4 Kb5 5.Kd3 Kc5 µ (-1.25) depth: 12/23 00:00:00 520kN 1.Rxb3 Rxb3 2.Kxb3 Kxa6 3.Kc4 Kb6 4.Kd4 c5+ 5.Kd3 Kc6 6.Ke4 c4 7.Kd4 Kb5 8.Kc3 -+ (-1.43) depth: 13/19 00:00:02 1293kN 1.Kb5 µ (-1.40) depth: 13/25 00:00:03 2293kN 1.Kb5 Re3 2.Ka5 c6 3.Rb2 Re5+ 4.Kb4 Rb5+ 5.Kc4 Kxa6 6.Rxb3 Rxb3 7.Kxb3 µ (-1.34) depth: 14/27 00:00:07 4441kN 1.Kb5 Re3 2.Ka5 c6 3.Rb2 Re5+ 4.Kb4 Rb5+ 5.Kc4 Kxa6 6.Rxb3 Rxb3 7.Kxb3 µ (-1.34) depth: 15/28 00:00:11 6702kN 1.Kb5 Re3 2.Ka5 c6 3.Rb2 Re5+ 4.Kb4 Rb5+ 5.Kc4 Kxa6 6.Rxb3 Rxb3 7.Kxb3 µ (-1.34) depth: 16/31 00:00:20 12239kN 1.Kb5 Re3 2.Ka5 c6 3.Rb2 Re5+ 4.Kb4 Rb5+ 5.Kc4 Kxa6 6.Rxb3 Rxb3 7.Kxb3 µ (-1.34) depth: 17/31 00:00:41 23592kN (Mahamood, home 24.12.2001) it thinks Kb5 is better, but either way, white is not in good position. I think the problem started for white way earlier in the game, I need to take a shot at it too. regards pavs
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.