Author: Christophe Theron
Date: 09:47:43 12/25/01
Go up one level in this thread
On December 25, 2001 at 03:26:02, Kurt Utzinger wrote:
>On December 24, 2001 at 10:33:55, K. Burcham wrote:
>
>>On December 24, 2001 at 02:22:09, Kurt Utzinger wrote:
>>
>>>This kind of position has ever been a substantial weakness of the Tiger
>>>programs. In this respect, it's not new what you have found out.
>>>Kurt
>>
>>
>>please post your analysis kurt, that you are refering to, that shows Tiger
>>has a problem that other programs do not.
>>
>>i believe the posts here, with this posiiton, prove your statement not true.
>>
>>kburcham
>
>Have found no such game is in my database and therefore I admit that I was
>wrong. The positions I had in mind must have been played by CT_12 or CT_13, the
>predecessors of CT_14.
>Kurt
Hi Kurt
I know very few people able to admit that they have been wrong. So I really
appreciate your post above.
Actually you are not completely wrong in what you say. Tiger might in some cases
exchange into a lost pawn endgame. However most chess programs including the
best ones have the same problems.
I'm working to improve this. As I understand you have a database of games where
it happened with CT12 and CT13.
Could you please post or email me some of these positions? I would like to try
to solve this problem, at least partially.
Thanks in advance.
Christophe
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.