Author: Sune Larsson
Date: 15:40:04 12/25/01
Go up one level in this thread
On December 25, 2001 at 16:57:06, K. Burcham wrote: > >Okey, I reasoned like this. "After the takings on b3 there is a pawn ending. > If I remove the 3 pawns on the king's side it's a draw - coming stalemate. > But in the above position white sometimes must play g4 or g3 and black takes > and promotes." Why calculate specific variations? > > Sune > > >becuase sune, we see time after time that programs prove a GM analyzed >postion has been wrong. if you have all the logic of this position >in order, then that is good. i did not analyze the logic of your reply. > >also sometimes it is just to see how much time or what the line is >the program will decide on. but i feel you already know these thoughts. > >kburcham Ok, I understand - we all have different threshholds for when a position is totally won. By the way, I appreciate your analysis of this position with diffrent programs, clearly showing that they all have some problems here. Sune
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.