Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 14:20:37 06/12/98
Go up one level in this thread
On June 12, 1998 at 15:57:54, blass uri wrote: >the main problem in the game is that black took the white bishop at g5 >if black played another move instead of h6xg5(the simplest is Nd5) >I do not see how white can win. It can. But not that easy. >The main problem of the program was that it did not analyze enough >moves like Qh6 and ideas like 0-0 and after it Rxf6. Right. But when I play f3 in this opening, my idea is to use the f-file !! And therefore also the queen movements are only possible because of f3. So - maybe black was lost when white played f3 ? I am sure your computers will find out this - if they would have enough time :-)))) See you later -- 2040 ? 2100 ?!? :-))) IMO the primitive human way of playing chess is not that bad. BDG is a good example how easy methods can come to good results. Especially against dumb computers. Against humans the BDG is much more complicate, because no human would so easily castle into the trap. Or oversee the open-f-file. Or the idea behind BDG. Thats the problem . You programs have NO IDEA about this opening...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.