Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto
Date: 04:17:07 01/03/02
Go up one level in this thread
On January 03, 2002 at 07:01:49, Mogens Larsen wrote: >On January 02, 2002 at 19:47:49, Dan Andersson wrote: > >>Wore than that. It violates one of the foundations of science. According to Karl >>Popper. The Falsification Principle. > >I don't think there's any reason to involve someone as sensible as Popper in a >discussion revolving around "My imaginary refutation is better than your >imaginary refutation". It's nothing more than opinions, so principles of science >has nothing to do with it. While the original discussion is purely opinions (in fact, that was the point), the problem of a question that can never be refuted is not. -- GCP
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.