Author: Don Dailey
Date: 09:52:54 06/14/98
Go up one level in this thread
On June 13, 1998 at 22:35:54, Hristo wrote: >Hello Don! > >>... Since I consider myself to be a scientist I will always >>collect facts and definitions and work within them. ... > >What is the power of prediction that the total TACTICS method gives you >?! >It's not that good, is it !? If you are a scientist how can you stand, >so firmly, behind a method which has such low level of "prediction" ... >the current state of the chess programs has very little scientific >value(for chess it self). It has much more comercial value !!! >"My" program is stronger than "his" hence I know better !!! Bull ... >nobody knows! Lets look at the facts, not with a microscope but with >some understanding to what these facts mean. The facts point out that >even if you manage to search 200 000 000 position per second you are >still not even close to get to the bottom of the problem! Deal with this >fact for a change! > >Hristo I think all of the modern programs use knowledge to determine which move to play. What are you talking about here? - Don
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.