Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 11:59:43 06/14/98
Go up one level in this thread
On June 14, 1998 at 05:40:15, blass uri wrote: >The first test position >>can you show me how white win against Junior after Nd5 instead of hxg5. 11...Nd5 12.Nxd5 exd 13. Bxe7 Re8 14.0-0 Rxe7 15. Rae1 Nf6 16. Ne5 Qd6 17. Re3 Re6 18.c4 c5 19.Rg3 Kf8 20.Bf5 Rxe5 ... >>in the second game 15...Qa5+ is better than 15...Qe8 and I am not sure >>if >>black loses. > >I believe 15...Qa5+ losing after 16.c3 >I believe the mistake in the games was hxg5 We can "prove" the second game later... >If I decide they are good moves by evaluation function like Cstal then >I do unsound sacrifices. And ? Whole life is unsound ! Nobody knows anything exactly. I can pretty well live with this fact. >Junior4.6 cannot find it in a reasonable time Almost any program fails. But humans ? How many humans would take here having seen the moves before. Even myself would not take here. >The third test position: > >The position Genius5 lost against Cstal by playing the mistake c5 >is also a good test position for computer programs. > >r2r2k1/p4p1p/bqp1p1p1/4N3/1b1P4/8/PPQ2PPP/R1BR3K > >black to move > >Cstal does not do this mistake but Cstal also do unsound sacrifices. Oh man. you must write in in stone, with golden letters on granit: CSTAL does unsound sacs. How political incorrect !
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.