Author: Peter McKenzie
Date: 04:39:28 06/18/98
Go up one level in this thread
Bob Hyatt wrote: >How about this: > >Pick a position from the first 12 test cases, ignoring number one which >should never have been in the test, and then run the test position for >depth=1, then 2, then 3, then 4, and so forth, and publish the node counts >here. I'm fixing to do the same... in fact, here are my numbers for >position #5, from 1 to 10 plies deep: > > depth total nodes ratio <added to original quote> > 1 61 > 2 299 4.9 > 3 1,939 6.5 > 4 9.052 4.7 > 5 41,606 4.6 > 6 121,430 2.9 > 7 459,585 3.8 > 8 1,244,527 2.7 > 9 2,935,151 2.4 > 10 6,494,133 2.2 Node counts from lambChop: depth total nodes 1 63 2 328 5.2 3 3,870 11.8 4 15,552 4.0 5 68,331 4.4 6 264,674 3.9 7 1,520,524 5.7 8 3,691,857 2.4 9 16,369,682 4.4 looks like I have some testing to do... >those are using a 12mb hash table (crafty) and a 3m pawn hash >table. the 10 ply search took 1:16 (all were run with one cpu). >these node counts are the *total* node counts, so the 10 ply >count includes all the ones before it, plus the nodes added by >the 10 ply iteration... > > >Bob
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.