Author: pavel
Date: 10:14:21 01/28/02
Go up one level in this thread
On January 28, 2002 at 13:06:28, Roy Eassa wrote: >On January 28, 2002 at 12:59:55, Daniel Clausen wrote: > >>Hi >> >>On January 28, 2002 at 11:55:01, Roy Eassa wrote: >> >>>On January 28, 2002 at 11:44:00, Will Singleton wrote: >>> >>>>The new Mac G4's came out today, 933mhz and 1ghz versions. ... >>> >>> >>>There's a dual 1 GHz version too. Given that the G4 often tests out as twice as >>>fast per MHz than Intel/AMD chips, it should be FAST! >> >>In case of certain Photoshop filters, yes. But not in general. In general I'd >>say a G3 roughly equals a P3 with +150Mhz, in case of a G4 maybe a P3 with >>+250Mhz. >> > > >Fair enough (and much more polite than some). > >In that case, the equivalent of a dual-1.25 GHz P3 system would still be pretty >fast, especially for Mac users who are accustomed to lower MHz's in recent >years. And even Hiarcs 7.0 (for which there IS a Mac version) running on that >system would be very strong IMO. > I heard there is a 64 bit MAC coming out? Any new about it? an off-topic question. I am assuming you are a MAC user, is it possible to install a differant system (intel, amd) on mac computer case? It looks too cool to resist, if only the computer was as good. :( pavs > >>>If Hiarcs 8 comes out for Mac OS (and/or Mac OS X), might it be the strongest >>>for any home computer? >> >>Since this is more than unlikely (IMO, YMMV), I won't speculate about that. :) >> >>Sargon
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.