Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 03:38:19 02/01/02
Go up one level in this thread
On February 01, 2002 at 06:10:17, David Rasmussen wrote: [snip] >Woah, backup. I _never_ said that a ply is a good measure to compare programs. >In fact, I said in my previous post that the notion of one ply is well defined, >but that it cannot be used to compare nominal search depths etc. Well, think we can agree that a chess move by one side is a ply. But that's not how most chess programs count plies of analysis. In fact, none of them do that. >I think we agree, but that you are just not reading my posts... :) Not at all unlikely. I have definitely been having reading comprehension problems recently
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.