Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 20:34:36 02/10/02
Go up one level in this thread
On February 10, 2002 at 01:25:30, Jeremiah Penery wrote: >On February 09, 2002 at 22:31:20, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>I simply say there is no evidence to support a diminishing return theory. It >>might happen, or it might not. Experimental data from today's programs, >>searching to depths they might reach in the next couple of years, suggests that >>no such diminishing return occurs for at least the next few plies. > >I think you're confusing diminishing returns in playing games with diminishing >rate of finding a new best move at higher ply depths. Just because a program >picks a new move at ply 15 over the move it had at ply 14 doesn't mean the game >outcome will change. Sometimes it will, but it is not as likely as a new move >found at ply 4 changing the game outcome over a move found at ply 3. How can you be sure, at GM-level chess?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.