Author: ramkumar
Date: 07:40:23 02/16/02
Go up one level in this thread
On February 16, 2002 at 08:12:01, Uri Blass wrote: >On February 16, 2002 at 04:37:20, Jonas Cohonas wrote: > >>On February 16, 2002 at 04:19:09, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >> >>>On February 16, 2002 at 03:47:54, Thoralf Karlsson wrote: >>> >>>> THE SSDF RATING LIST 2002-02-15 84193 games played by 235 computers >>>> Rating + - Games Won Oppo >>>> ------ --- --- ----- --- ---- >>>> 1 Shredder 6.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2715 46 -43 264 65% 2604 >>>> 2 Chess Tiger 14.0 CB 256MB Athlon 1200 2712 35 -34 431 64% 2610 >>>> 3 Deep Fritz 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2708 34 -33 447 63% 2616 >>>> 4 Gambit Tiger 2.0 256MB Athlon 1200 2706 38 -37 361 62% 2619 >>>> 5 Junior 7.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2682 35 -34 407 58% 2624 >>>> 6 Rebel Century 4.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2675 50 -46 225 65% 2563 >>>> 7 Shredder 5.32 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2661 32 -31 497 56% 2618 >>>> 8 Deep Fritz 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2657 25 -24 820 63% 2564 >>>> 9 Gandalf 4.32h 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2648 34 -33 430 54% 2620 >>>> 10 Gambit Tiger 2.0 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2643 30 -29 592 66% 2524 >>>> 1 Shredder 6.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz, 2715 >>>>CT14.0 A1200 17.5-16.5 Junior7 A1200 8.5-7.5 Gandal5 A1200 22-18 >>>>Fritz6 K6-450 13.5-8.5 Shred5 K6-450 33.5-10.5 Ch.Ti12 K6450 13.5-6.5 >>>>Nimz732 K6450 30.5-8.5 Junior5 K6450 29.5-12.5 Fritz532 P200 3.5-3.5 >>>> >>>>The new leader of the SSDF rating list is >>>>Shredder 6.0 Athlon 1200 MHz! After 264 games it >>>>has a rating of 2715, three points ahead of >>>>Chess Tiger 14.0. Compared to it's predecessor, >>>>Shredder 6.0 has 54 points more! >>>> >>>>Stefan Meyer-Kahlen is the reigning World Computer >>>>Chess Champion, and he has won several other champion- >>>>ships, but this is the first time for his program >>>>Shredder to take the top position of the SSDF rating >>>>list! >>> >>>I am indeed very surprised!! Never had I imagined that Shredder6 should ever be >>>able to be on the top of the SSDF rating list. The matches 40/120' played by >>>Harald Faber showed bad results for Shredder6 and in the running T2002 >>>tournament, Shredder6 is on the last place. And the games I have seen were not >>>at all convincing ... but no one [except SSDF] has so far played 264 games with >>>Shredder6. I do not know what to believe ... >>> >>>T2002 60'/120 >>> >>> Program Score % Av.Op. Elo + - >>>Draws >>> >>> 1 TheKing312X : 39.0/ 65 60.0 2388 2459 77 60 >>>43.1 % >>> 2 Fritz7002 : 35.5/ 65 54.6 2395 2427 83 53 >>>47.7 % >>> 3 Junior7 : 33.0/ 65 50.8 2399 2404 88 58 >>>40.0 % >>> 4 ChessTiger14 : 31.0/ 65 47.7 2403 2387 56 86 >>>43.1 % >>> 5 Hiarcs732 : 29.0/ 65 44.6 2406 2369 65 82 >>>33.8 % >>> 6 Shredder6 : 27.5/ 65 42.3 2409 2355 60 79 >>>41.5 % >>> >>>Kurt >> >>I must admit this comes as a surprise for me too: >> >> Program Elo + - Games Score Av.Op. Draws >> >> 1 Fritz 7b : 2683 112 91 30 65.0 % 2576 43.3 >>% >> 2 Shredder 6_Dual : 2660 82 64 60 58.3 % 2601 40.0 >>% >> 3 Junior 7 : 2650 65 58 98 56.1 % 2607 26.5 >>% >> 4 Fritz 7 (No MMX) : 2650 69 51 84 57.7 % 2596 44.0 >>% >> 5 Fritz 7a : 2640 70 63 80 58.1 % 2583 31.2 >>% >> 6 Gambit Tiger 2.0 : 2640 70 60 80 58.8 % 2578 35.0 >>% >> 7 Fritz 7 : 2608 68 88 64 49.2 % 2613 26.6 >>% >> 8 Chess Tiger 14.0 : 2598 77 62 80 51.9 % 2585 26.2 >>% >> 9 Deep Junior 7_Dual : 2595 109 109 30 50.0 % 2595 33.3 >>% >> 10 Deep Fritz : 2578 70 111 40 47.5 % 2596 45.0 >>% >> 11 Hiarcs 7.32 : 2546 156 156 10 50.0 % 2546 60.0 >>% >> 12 Shredder 5.32 : 2546 61 79 70 45.0 % 2581 35.7 >>% >> 13 Crafty 18.13 : 2542 92 82 50 34.0 % 2657 28.0 >>% >> 14 Deep Junior 7 : 2537 115 122 30 41.7 % 2595 23.3 >>% >> 15 Crafty 17.14 : 2534 85 81 50 33.0 % 2657 34.0 >>% >> 16 Shredder 6 : 2506 110 92 40 32.5 % 2633 25.0 >>% >> 17 Nimzo 8 : 2484 91 95 40 35.0 % 2591 35.0 >>% >> >>Regards >>Jonas > >Your rating are based on a different opening book. > >I guess that better opening book and maybe also some luck were among the things >that helped shredder to get the first place >We are going to see If shredder can keep it's place above Tiger14 and Deep Fritz >in the next list. > >Uri I am confused why the ssdf always uses best for the top and least for the least programme(1.2ghz athlon and k6 450MHZ always)+256mb hash for tops and 128 for least tops.And another sizzling questions is why ssdf always compare the known commercial like fritz the CB's product's again and again I always see the same programme in same hash and in same cpu ?IT doesn't show up anything why don't they test the new commers engine or products??? ram
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.