Author: Marc van Hal
Date: 15:36:42 02/18/02
Go up one level in this thread
On February 18, 2002 at 16:06:54, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On February 18, 2002 at 13:47:59, Volker Pittlik wrote: >>Thanks for your telephatic diagnostics. > >there is no need for telepathie. all it needs is >to know you and to read your statements. > >and i have met you in person. right? :-) > >>Because most people believe in *one* reality which exist whithout our point of >>view to it. The sense of communication is to get a common sense of our points of >>views. If you like to establish different realities, what's the sense of >>communication? > >different realities ?? > >does ANYBODY ever know what is real and what is not real ? > I only make my coments on when a discusion makes sence and how to come closer to realety and not over the project Uri made with the Macheid settings. Actualy a discusion makes sence if both partys can take benifit from it. When a discusion takes place and one side is not listening will lead to much discomfort on both sides. (A nice example from this discomfort was Cristopher Columbus) It is always helpfull first listen to the new ideas. Then look at the facts and only then take your conclusions. And peopel who think they know everything and are not open for new ideas are fools. Regards Marc van Hal
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.