Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 02:11:09 02/19/02
Go up one level in this thread
On February 18, 2002 at 18:56:57, martin fierz wrote: >physicians are physicists in english. being one myself, i can tell you that like >your new paradigm in computer chess, the "new physics" of these guys has not got >much support from the broad mass of physicists. and ? it does not say that their ideas of cordoba 1980 was wrong. maybe the other physicists did not understand charon. and maybe he once gave up to explain to the others what his ideas are. I like wheelers, bohms and charons ideas. IMO their point of view of reality is very interesting. i am not interested in how the others thought about it. >if you wanted to talk about a >*real* paradigm shift in physics, you could try relativity theory or quantum >mechanics, both of which replaced older theories. i don't think so. charons ideas ARE the theory relativity complex. he continued theory of relativity. >so how exactly does your god-like century 4 look for a plan then? > >or does it make no sense either to try to understand your posts :-) ? > >aloha > martin it would be a good idea to replay the games. maybe with another program. to understand. its all in the games.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.