Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 07:58:40 06/28/98
Go up one level in this thread
On June 28, 1998 at 06:06:52, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > >On June 27, 1998 at 15:32:50, Keith Ian Price wrote: > >>2^250= >>1809251394333065553493296640760748560207343510400633813116524750123642650624 >> >>2^400= >>2582249878086908589655919172003011874329705792829223512830659356540647622016841194629645353280137831435903171972747493376 >> >>The latter number is greater than the estimated number of atoms in the universe, >>so making the gates may be troublesome. >> >>In case you were really interested. >> >>kp > >So that never fits on a chip. Only the number of possibilities which are >in the reach of a function. > >Vincent :) talk about missing the point. You said you know something about hardware design, then talk about gate delays as if all I can do is tie one gate to another in a long singular line. I pointed out that this is wrong. And tried to explain how I can do *real complicated* things in those 40nano second cycles of a DB processor, because I don't think just "vertical" I also think "horizontal". and then you say "can't put that many gates on a chip". jeez... :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.