Author: Bernhard Bauer
Date: 04:00:36 03/06/02
Go up one level in this thread
On March 06, 2002 at 06:32:29, Daniel Clausen wrote: >Hi > >On March 06, 2002 at 05:57:10, Bernhard Bauer wrote: > >>On March 06, 2002 at 05:37:14, Andreas Stabel wrote: >> >>>The discussion of castling possibility or not reminds me of a silly >>>similar problem somebody once presented me with: >>> >>>[D]8/8/8/8/1p2p3/1P1kP3/1P3P2/2K3N1 w Q - >>> >>>White to mate in half a move :) >>> >>>Best regards >>>Andreas Stabel >> >>Nice position, but I'm shure sombody will complain about wrong EPD, incorrect >>FEN and so on. But I don't exspect such strong opinions as in the other >>thread, because people can't relay on tablebases here. > >Incorrect FEN!!!!! ;) > >Why don't you expect strong opinions in this thread? The FEN is incorrect >because the FEN is incorrect, not because tablebases in a somewhat related >position don't work. ;) > >Sargon Your'r right, why shouldn't I expect strong opinions in this thread? :) And I agree That the FEN is incorrect because the FEN is incorrect. And I even agree it's not because of table bases. The problem with this position is not even null-move error. It's half null-move error. -:) Kind regards Bernhard
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.