Author: Roy Eassa
Date: 09:47:47 03/06/02
Go up one level in this thread
IMO, Bob's view is that HALF-CASTLING is a HALF-ASSED THING! On March 06, 2002 at 11:06:05, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On March 06, 2002 at 08:26:49, Bernhard Bauer wrote: > >>On March 06, 2002 at 08:06:29, Jouni Uski wrote: >> >>>On March 06, 2002 at 05:37:14, Andreas Stabel wrote: >>> >>>>The discussion of castling possibility or not reminds me of a silly >>>>similar problem somebody once presented me with: >>>> >>>>[D]8/8/8/8/1p2p3/1P1kP3/1P3P2/2K3N1 w Q - >>>> >>>>White to mate in half a move :) >>>> >>>>Best regards >>>>Andreas Stabel >>> >>>This is easy Rd1 mate! >>> >>>Jouni >> >>Ahhhm, your basically right, even most people here would say your wrong, because >>the FEN is wrong. :-)) >>So let me give the position again with the corrected FEN: >>[D]8/8/8/8/1p2p3/1P1kP3/1P3P2/2K3N1 w Q/2 - >> >>Please notice the Q/2 flag in the position. It obviously means that castling to >>the queen side is allowed partially - exactly by a half. >>This new feature will be part of the new epd description as soon as S. J. >>Edwards has time to give a new request for comment (RFC). >>Kind regards >>Bernhard > > >Can you please explain what all this nonsense is about? half-castling and >such?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.