Author: Miguel A. Ballicora
Date: 09:52:18 03/06/02
Go up one level in this thread
On March 06, 2002 at 12:43:07, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >On March 06, 2002 at 11:06:05, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On March 06, 2002 at 08:26:49, Bernhard Bauer wrote: >> >>>On March 06, 2002 at 08:06:29, Jouni Uski wrote: >>> >>>>On March 06, 2002 at 05:37:14, Andreas Stabel wrote: >>>> >>>>>The discussion of castling possibility or not reminds me of a silly >>>>>similar problem somebody once presented me with: >>>>> >>>>>[D]8/8/8/8/1p2p3/1P1kP3/1P3P2/2K3N1 w Q - >> >>Can you please explain what all this nonsense is about? half-castling and >>such? > >I think the idea is that White is halfway through his move, and >the move in question was castling queenside. Therefore, the king >is already on it's square, but the rook is in the hand of the >player, which is why it's not on the board. By putting down >the rook white mates, so it's mate in half a move. Unfortunately, Dr. Hyatt failed to pass the turing test. :-) Regards, Miguel > >-- >GCP
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.