Author: leonid
Date: 08:23:42 03/07/02
Go up one level in this thread
On March 07, 2002 at 11:09:41, Heiner Marxen wrote: >On March 07, 2002 at 08:47:50, leonid wrote: > >>On March 06, 2002 at 15:10:33, Daniel Clausen wrote: >> >>>On March 06, 2002 at 15:05:01, Dann Corbit wrote: >>> >>>>On March 06, 2002 at 15:00:46, Terry McCracken wrote: >>>> >>>>>On March 06, 2002 at 14:33:05, Dann Corbit wrote: >>>>> >>>>If castling rights can be hidden (missing from the position description) then >>>>why not pieces? >>>>;-) >>>>[D]5Q1Q/5Q1Q/5Q1Q/5Q1Q/8/6P1/6k1/4KR1R w K - >>> >>>Sorry Dann, but this position is illegal. There was no valid white move for each >>> last black move. (I hope I didn't overlook something...) >>> >>>Sargon :) >> >>And how about few pieces more?! >> >>[D]4bQqQ/4bQBQ/4qQnQ/4NQqQ/4BqNq/4qqPq/4nrkr/4KRqR w - - >> >>Position is still very accessible. >> >>And what is your solution? >> >>Leonid. > >Obviously you could not resist! :-)) Yes, but still I was very careful not to give some difficult position. In reality, I had preference for other that is two moves deeper. [D]4bQqQ/4qQNQ/4nQnQ/4BQqQ/4NqBq/4qqPr/4nrkb/4KRqR w - - > >After mere 1.7 seconds (Athlon 1500+) Chest finds a mate in 9: >PV: Rxh2+ Qhxh2 Nxe3+ Kh1 Bxf3+ Rg2 Bxg2+ Qxg2 Qxh4+ Qfxh4 Qxh4+ Qxh4 Qhxh4+ >Nxh4 Qhxh4+ Qh2 Qf3# Time is excellent and I doubt very much that somebody will come with brute force solution. Cheers, Leonid. >So, this was not very hard ;-) > >Cheers, >Heiner
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.