Author: martin fierz
Date: 11:56:13 03/22/02
Go up one level in this thread
On March 22, 2002 at 04:40:50, Otello Gnaramori wrote: >On March 21, 2002 at 18:54:19, martin fierz wrote: > >>On March 21, 2002 at 18:29:26, Otello Gnaramori wrote: >> >>>On March 21, 2002 at 17:52:36, Thomas Lagershausen wrote: >>> >>>>DJ7 is worldchampion of computerchess.Todays game against Gulko shows that this >>>>means nothing. When the program had to play against a human player completly >>>>other things are important to play a highrated game.Junior is the weakest >>>>program in the competion against Gulko.Gulko had played real antichess today but >>>>DeepJunior7 can´t improve the own position. >>> >>>It's quite easy to draw against comps in that way : keeping the position closed >>>at any costs and moving back and forth pieces like Gulko did tonight. >>>A real anticomp strategy to me means a winning strategy (...sorry) , not a >>>_Drawish_ one. >>> >>>w.b.r. >>>Otello >> >>this was not drawish strategy at all... >>i bet gulko was in time trouble in the final position and that's why he took the >>draw. can anyone confirm this? look at it - he has 2 pawns more, why would he >>take a draw there? >> >>aloha >> martin > >I think you didn't follow the game.... > >w.b.r. >Otello i replayed the game, i did not follow it. of course there was a lot of maneuvering around of the pieces, but sometimes, that is all you can do. watching chess games is *never* boring to me, as long as i can think about what i would be going to play next - and in such a closed position you have a lot to think about... aloha martin
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.