Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Junior7 had misses three opportunitys to open the b-line

Author: J.Dufek

Date: 14:15:44 03/23/02

Go up one level in this thread


On March 23, 2002 at 16:41:30, Torstein Hall wrote:

>On March 23, 2002 at 10:36:55, Ricardo Gibert wrote:
>
>>On March 23, 2002 at 09:46:44, Torstein Hall wrote:
>>
>>>On March 23, 2002 at 07:48:32, Ricardo Gibert wrote:
>>>
>>>>On March 23, 2002 at 06:15:54, Torstein Hall wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On March 22, 2002 at 15:11:25, Ricardo Gibert wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On March 22, 2002 at 12:32:24, Thomas Lagershausen wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>[D]2kr1bnr/ppqb1pp1/4p2p/nP1pP3/2pP4/2P2N2/P1B1NPPP/1RBQ1RK1 w - -
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>After the statement of Amir Ban that DeepJunior7 didn´t find a opportunity to
>>>>>>>open the game i have to say i was surprised.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>At move 15 till move 17 DeepJunior 7 could easily open the b-line with the
>>>>>>>logical b5-b6!.According to Shredder 6.02 the best move in the position.After
>>>>>>>that move white gets what he deserves, open lines for his rooks to attack the
>>>>>>>black king.After ...axb6 it makes no sense to play b6-b5 for black because white
>>>>>>>opens further lines with a4!.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Yesterdays play of both sides of the board can´t convince me.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>TL
>>>>>>
>>>>>>The move b6 in the diagramed position does not do any good. Black has more wood
>>>>>>and more space on the Q-side. Why would you want to sac a pawn there?
>>>>>
>>>>>Thats where you got whites ultimate target, the black King! After 1.b6 axb6
>>>>>2.Be3 g5 white can get quite a pressure against the white king. (Look at Ba4 or
>>>>>perhaps just simply a doubling of rooks on the b file )
>>>>>
>>>>>Torstein
>>>>
>>>>Ba4 offers the exchange of Whites good bishop for Blacks bad bishop. While the
>>>>attempt to double rooks with Rb2 will be met by Ba3 or black could play Kc8
>>
>>I meant Kb8.
>>
>>
>>with
>>>>the idea of playing Ng8-e7-c8 and White will get nowhere. BTW, I don't care for
>>>>your g5 move for Black, since it weakens the part of the board where White
>>>>should be playing.
>>>
>>>Should be playing etc. I like variations so after 1.b6 axb6 2. Ba4 [There is a
>>>lot of other possible moves for white of course. And the same goes for the black
>>>move.]2...Bxa4 3.Qxa4
>>>
>>>[D]2kr1bnr/1pq2pp1/1p2p2p/n2pP3/Q1pP4/2P2N2/P3NPPP/1RB2RK1 b - - 0 3
>>>
>>>I think white has a nice plus here. White can play Qb5 at his on leisure and get
>>>the pawn back with pressure on the b file. Ths bishop is not bad when it comes
>>>out in front of the pawns.
>>>
>>>Torstein
>>
>>What happened to your 2.Be3?
>>
>>In any case, after your 1.b6 axb6 2.Ba4 Bxa4 3.Qa4 Kb8 with the idea of
>>Ng8-e7-c8 or Ka7 followed by Qc6 expelling Whites Queen.
>>
>>If 4.Qb5 Ka7 accomplishes less than nothing for White, since White is no longer
>>ready to play as Ba3 to get rid of Blacks good Bishop and Black still has his
>>plans.
>>
>>If 4.Ba3 Bxa3 5.Qxa3 Ne7 and Black is poised to complete his plan of shuting
>>down Whites play on the Q-side completely with Nc8. White has expended a pawn to
>>"attack" on the wrong side of the board, minimized the value of his space
>>advantage by exchanging pieces and has no attack to show for it on either side
>>of the board. All very anti-positional.
>
>I may not understand this position, but how can an open line directed at the
>opeonent king be on the wrong side of the board? White is at least +/= . And how
>can opening up in front of your own king be right for white? As I said, it may
>be I do not understand, but playing on kingside for white looks like plain
>suicide to me!

Look into "My system". As white you _need_ destroy pawn e6. Basic of strategy.
Lot of games in C02 ECO (lot of Movsesian's and Svesnikov's games, only with
pawns on a3+b2 and not a2+b5) was win with this plan.

J.

>
>Torstein
>>
>>Instead, White could have pursued an initiative on the K-side in a very thematic
>>manner that is harder to stop. Black cannot easily utilize his Q, Na5 and Bc8 on
>>the K-side and White should try to exploit this as a superiority of force on
>>that side of the board.






This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.