Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Faster Hardware vs Average Player

Author: Harald Faber

Date: 00:02:47 07/09/98

Go up one level in this thread


On July 07, 1998 at 17:44:29, Robert Hyatt wrote:

>>>When I started playing chess on the PC I had a 386.  I had Grandmaster and
>>>Chessmaster.  I could play competitively, but usually lost.  My next computer
>>>will probably be faster than a Pentium II 400.  At 1 second per move, the 400
>>>will be equivalent to about 3 min per move on the 386.  That doesnt give me much
>>>of chance, especially if I want to play speed games.
>>>
>>>I humbly request that future chess programs allow time controls <1 sec per move
>>>so average players like me can have the satisfaction of kicking their butts once
>>>in a while.  Sure, I can win by playing against weak modes, but its not as fun.
>>>Vince
>>
>>There are other possibilities. Try reducing the program's strength by reducing
>>the programs ELO IE.
>
>
>the ones I have seen don't work very well.  IE a dumb program on a PII/450 is
>still a tactical monster and will punish most beginner-level players even if you
>set all the eval terms == 0.000.
>And "choosing an Elo rating" is really a joke, when the programs estimate their
>ratings at 2500+ in almost every case...

Maybe not all programs really reduce their strength as they show and should but
there are programs able to do so. At least Fritz does well enough.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.