Author: SEAN EVANS
Date: 14:43:03 07/09/98
Go up one level in this thread
On July 08, 1998 at 18:03:50, SEAN EVANS wrote: >The Asshole writes: This is a reference to *me* it is an inside joke between Bruce Moreland and I, that's it! Mr. Ban called it "Sophisticated" (I blushed). The balance of the post is "On Topic" and a friendly gesture to Bruce to help him recall the thread he was thinking of! No negative vibes or attacks in this post! It appears Mr. Daley is having a problem defining what needs to be censored. The following is a quote from a Judge attempting to define Pornography; "I shall not today attempt to define the kinds of material to be embraced within that shorthand description; and perhaps I could never succeed in intelligibly doing so. But I know it when I see it." Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart,(Jocabellis v. State of Ohio) I state again, Your Friend In Computer Chess, The Apostle Sean >This is one of the emails in the thread you are referring to, what happened is >Moritz Berger felt that Vincent Diepeveen was attacking his "Best Buddy" >Schroeder in another thread about Rebel's Killer Books and he did not like that! > >No I do not think Mr. Diepeveen's post should have been destroyed by the >Censors! > >In fact several Club Members and I concurred with the above statement and stated >this in the Thread. > >Your friend in Computer Chess, > >The Apostle Sean > > > > >Subject: Re: MODERATION, please >From: Bruce Moreland >E-mail: brucemo@seanet.com >Message Number: 20763 >Date: June 17, 1998 at 02:21:01 > In Reply to: Re: MODERATION, please > Message ID: 20742 > Posted by: Vincent Diepeveen > At: diep@xs4all.nl > On: June 16, 1998 at 16:57:19 > > >On June 16, 1998 at 16:57:19, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > >>I'm not attacking Rebel for making the killerbook, i'm not even attacking >>rebel. It's clear that it won from Diep this match. I just want YOU the audience >>to know that book cooking is happening, and that the rebel book was again >>a reaction on the killing cg5 book (cg5 book kills especially rebel8 book). > >I think I would like to understand where you are going with all of this, >Vincent. I'm confused because whenever I see threads like this my brain swells >up and I can't understand or remember anything. > >You think Rebel is tuned against various things? > >You think Fritz is tuned against various things? > >It seems obvious that some programs are tuned against some other programs, for >instance MChess has had a special book for a really long time, so it's not >unprecedented for things to be tuned against other things. > >Do you think someone has acted improperly here, and if so, how can we discuss it >in such a way that it doesn't degrade into a huge shrieking match? > >Is this just a new round of the old killer book discussion or is there more to >this? > >bruce
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.