Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: is shr.paderborn an improvement on s6?

Author: Sandro Necchi

Date: 22:15:25 04/04/02

Go up one level in this thread


On April 04, 2002 at 18:03:23, Chessfun wrote:

>On April 04, 2002 at 14:14:51, Sandro Necchi wrote:
>
>>On April 01, 2002 at 02:03:15, Chessfun wrote:
>>
>>>On April 01, 2002 at 01:55:29, Sandro Necchi wrote:
>>>
>>>>On March 31, 2002 at 16:46:42, liam hearns wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>thanks in advance!
>>>>
>>>>I did not have time enough to test it very much
>>>
>>>>, but I got the impression it is about 15 to 20 points stronger than 6.0
>>>
>>>
>>>April fool ?.
>>
>>Lack of fantasy?
>
>
>Agh I see replying once to the same post isn't enough.

No.
>
>
>>Of course if a good programmer works on the engine and is able to improve some
>>parts of the engine the result is a stronger engine.
>
>
>Did he tell you he had improved some parts of the engine?

Yes, but this is not important. I want to see them.

>I'm sure also the case of other engines MCP8 comes to mind, even Nimzo 8, the
>"good" programmers felt they produced a stronger engine.

MCP8 was the best engine by Marty. The best commercial one as there has been
another which I own which was never showed to the pubblic. The problem was that
it would have been better using faster hardware as it was optimized at
tournament time level (40/2).

>
>
>>Isn't the same in USA?
>
>
>No idea, but doubt it.
>
>
>>Sorry I forgot you like more marks ??
>
>
>No, I simply like data that supports claims.

Well, in 1976 I told many people that in year 2000 computer would have reach GM
playing level. People where laughing at me and telling me that there was no
suppurt claims to that and many technical articles were saying things different.
Of course what I said was based on specific thing that I expected to be done
later and to more powerful hardware.
Everybody is able to see things when they are done, only some before. I guess
you are in the first category and I am in the second, so it would be difficul to
speak to each other as you will remain on your idea.
However I do agree with you that looking only played games after they have been
played, you need very many to have an idea, but this is not what I do.

Sandro
>
>Sarah.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.