Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Anti-GM - Is the Original Rebel Example Sound?

Author: fca

Date: 00:03:57 07/15/98

Go up one level in this thread


On July 14, 1998 at 21:07:49, Howard Exner wrote:

>On July 14, 1998 at 18:27:26, blass uri wrote:
>

>>It is not truth
>>The programs I have do not grab the rook if I give them 3 minutes.
>>Rxe6 is a good anti computer move.
>
>I agree, Rxe6 is a good move. If the point of the anti-Gm approach
>is to complicate things then Rxe6 is the move to play especially
>in an over-the-board encounter with the clocks ticking.

As already stated, I am unsure that it does complicate matters as in the Black
line (starting 1... fxe6) is fairly obvious.  The forced or "natural" (of
course, I speak about human) moves by Black win for Black, with only a mate or
two to sidestep.

Please could you _specifically_ say what alternative does Black (human) have to
1... fxe6?

Kind regards

fca

PS: I am aware there may be a problem in that the better player (lower GM) may
see threats not visible to the weaker player, and so avoids the line, through
missing a defence.  So the weaker player ends up making the actually better
move.  But *here* (i.e. in this position) I feel that this is not the case.  The
 line to press the attack is hard for White (and while Black has also to predict
White's moves...) and the response is easy for Black (relatively).



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.