Author: blass uri
Date: 11:54:33 07/15/98
Go up one level in this thread
On July 15, 1998 at 14:27:18, Howard Exner wrote: >On July 14, 1998 at 21:54:40, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On July 14, 1998 at 21:07:49, Howard Exner wrote: >> >>>On July 14, 1998 at 18:27:26, blass uri wrote: >>> >>> >>>>It is not truth >>>>The programs I have do not grab the rook if I give them 3 minutes. >>>>Rxe6 is a good anti computer move. >>> >>>I agree, Rxe6 is a good move. If the point of the anti-Gm approach >>>is to complicate things then Rxe6 is the move to play especially >>>in an over-the-board encounter with the clocks ticking. >> >> >>I think you are grossly under-estimating Anand. > >Where did I mention Anand in this thread? It is a thread about a chess position >and what might be a good move for a computer to play. > >>You don't want to play >>moves that complicate things, you want to play moves that win. You play >>Rxe6 against Anand, you may as well take a shower with your electric toaster, >>because he'll calculate that position, probably in blitz time control, and >>rip the rook and the game... > >No need to lecture us on Anand's ability. I think we are all aware of how >great a player he is. >> >>Complicated and unsound together don't work. Complicated without being unsound >>is ok. > >Why not demonstrate why Rxe6 is unsound? Is that not the point you are trying to >make? Why muddy it with the spin on how you understand how well Anand plays > while I am somehow underestimating him? > >Show me Rxe6 is unsound and I'll retract my claim that it is a good choice for >a computer to make in playing a human. It won't be the first time I'm wrong >about a chess move. Rxe6 was discussed in this club and after Rxe6 fxe6 I believe black win what do you play as white after Rxe6 fxe6? Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.