Author: Mark Young
Date: 15:30:21 07/18/98
Go up one level in this thread
On July 18, 1998 at 06:36:47, blass uri wrote: > >On July 17, 1998 at 19:48:20, Mark Young wrote: > >>On July 16, 1998 at 22:21:28, Joe McCarron wrote: >> >>>On July 15, 1998 at 11:27:58, blass uri wrote: >>> >>>>do computer programs play in correspondence chess against humans >>>>and if yes I have 2 questions: >>>>1)what is the international rating? >>>>2)do their opponents know they play against a computer? >>>> >>>>I am sure computers have no chance against good players >>>>but they are many correspondence players who do not use a computer >>>>because they feel it is unethical. >>>> >>>>I know that in many correspondence games >>>>weak players do tactical mistakes because they do not use a computer. >>>> >>>>Uri >>>I once read that humans have the best chance against computers at roughly over >>>the board tournament time controls. But I would also be interested in finding >>>out how computers do in coorespondance as I would also think humans do better. >> >> >>Computers get crushed pretty badly playing strong players at correspondence >>chess. If I remember right IM Mike Valvo played (DT) in a 2 game match at >>correspondece chess. Mike crushed it even though DT was thinking many hours per >>move, and hitting 30 plies in its search. > >how could they see 30 plies deep? >it seem impossible in brute force depth even after hours >and if it is selective depth then it is possible to see more. > Im not sure. I am remembering a story I read almost 10 years ago. Im sure that what it said, but don't remember all the details. >Uri > >> I remember reading how shocked the >>programmers were at how badly the program lost. Even if Deep Blue was playing I >>think the results would have been the same. This shows how much more room there >>is left to improve programs.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.