Author: Otello Gnaramori
Date: 09:20:44 04/20/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 20, 2002 at 10:19:28, Mike Hood wrote: > Of course, I don't mean to say that this method of playing is >ineffective. It's been said that chess is 95% tactics and 5% stragegy. I agree. >Computer >programs are brilliant tacticians, and so a strategy has to be very cleverly >devised to outwit them. It takes someone of Smirin's level to devise such a >winning strategy. Smirin has not still won the match, just found a weak point in Shreddy, same exact weakness found by Van Wely in Fritz... a coincidence ? > Tactics aim at achieving a position, > strategy aims at achieving a pattern. Which is the difference between position and pattern ? Anyway if you let the tactics run forever you get a perfect strategy plan : tactics -> infinite = strategy. w.b.r. Otello
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.