Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: chess engines

Author: Tina Long

Date: 17:46:18 04/21/02

Go up one level in this thread


On April 21, 2002 at 18:40:58, Telmo Escobar wrote:

>On April 21, 2002 at 11:13:01, Jason Repa wrote:
>
>>What is the strongest commercially available chess engine for doing analysis of
>>a position?
>
> No one. Many people think Fritz 7 is currently the top engine, but that only
>means that Fritz 7 is capable to beat the other ones often. Assume that's right:
>it doesn't imply that Fritz is best to analyse positions.
>
> Concerning commercial engines, my advice is: if possible, don't use only an
>engine, purchase two or more of them. Personally, I prefer to analyse positions
>using Junior 7 and Chess Tiger 14. Junior is a speed monster, analysing at 15
>plyes or more in one minute or less.

Note that "Ply" in Junior is different to "Ply" in other programs.
Approximately 66%, 200%.
That is: when Junior says    Ply 21    that is the same as Fritz saying   14-42.

Approximately.

Tina Long


>Tiger, with its human-like style of play,
>is probably best understanding static positional features.
>
> You were asking about commercial engines. May I add that there are today many
>phenomenally strong freely available engines. You don't need to spend a buck to
>analyse positions well: just download Winboard and -say- Crafty, and you have
>enough software to do the work.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.