Author: Sune Fischer
Date: 10:40:45 04/29/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 29, 2002 at 13:29:12, Mogens Larsen wrote: >On April 29, 2002 at 13:10:06, Otello Gnaramori wrote: > >>I agree. >> >>Two things that favours comps at 40/2h : >> >>1) Computer can deepen very much the analysis at 40/2 and reach elo level far >>better than shorter reflection time. >> >>2) Humans tends to fatigue mentally in the long run. >> >> >>Any objections ? > >Yes. I find both statements dubious at best, ie. exaggerated beyond the truth. Definitely :) Humans play better at long time controls! Didn't you guys notice all the talk about how much the quality of the games at eg. the FIDE VM has declined with the new time control? Computers however, slowly stall because the tree grows exponentially. Against computers I think humans would have more time to calculate the precise tactics in the deep lines, whilst the deep lines would still be too deep for computers. -S. >Regards, >Mogens
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.