Author: Otello Gnaramori
Date: 11:56:07 04/29/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 29, 2002 at 13:49:30, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On April 29, 2002 at 13:10:06, Otello Gnaramori wrote: > >>On April 29, 2002 at 12:26:15, Uri Blass wrote: >> >> >>>It is possible that the computers could play also better at 40/2 hours and even >>>if you assume that the computers play the same I am not sure if he could win the >>>better positions at 40/2 hours. >>> >> >>I agree. >> >>Two things that favours comps at 40/2h : >> >>1) Computer can deepen very much the analysis at 40/2 and reach elo level far >>better than shorter reflection time. >> >>2) Humans tends to fatigue mentally in the long run. >> >> >>Any objections ? > >Several, from _lots_ of experience. The more time per move you give the >players, the _better_ the human does relative to the computer. I never said that time did't favours humans as other people wants me said (but are their conjectures not mine). I just said what favours comps, full point. It's innegable that time favours humans too , but in different measure and considering the endurance factor too (or stamina if you prefer). w.b.r. Otello
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.