Author: Vincent Lejeune
Date: 06:17:43 04/30/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 30, 2002 at 06:46:48, Uri Blass wrote: >we can also say that the final result in that case is 4.75-4.25 >for smirin based on the fact that we do not know >if the nulled game is a win for Junior or a draw because >we do not know if Junior could win it >so we can take the average as an estimate. > >Uri My view and appreciation of the match in some points ... Smirin-Shredder: Smirin was always better, worth : 1-0 Hiarcs-Smirin : Smirin understand more the middlegame-ending : 0.4-0.6 Smirin-Junior : Here Smirin attacked well and stay with an advantage but didn't find the winning plan : 0.6-0.4 Tiger-Smirin : Tiger got some counter play for the g2 pawn : 0.5-0.5 Shredder-Smirin: Shredder play the weak 22.Qf3 - doubled his pawn but play stronger than Smirin : 0.7-0.3 Smirin-Hiarcs: Hiarcs played better - only the fortress trick can save the game : 0.2-0.8 Junior-Smirin : Junior got a winning position after weak play by Smirin (may be not concentrate beacause dead-draw boring position) and junior had some problems to find the winning Bc5! : 0.6-0.4 Smirin-Tiger : Smirin beat the tiger tactically (i'm impressed) : 1-0 SUM : Smirin-Comp : 4.4-3.6 Let's play chess and enjoy it !! :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.