Author: Peter Berger
Date: 10:15:06 05/07/02
Go up one level in this thread
On May 07, 2002 at 04:44:50, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On May 06, 2002 at 17:35:39, Peter Berger wrote: > >>On May 06, 2002 at 17:01:11, Thorsten Czub wrote: >> >>> >>>how can hiarcs be that weak at your home ??? >>> >> >>You really want my opinion, Thorsten ? Statistics, Thorsten, statistics. > >statistics ?? of 6 games ?? Sure - with six games you have to expect a big error margin even in style ;) - statistics. > > >can you describe how hiarcs lost ? a pattern ? It is too early. Maybe a little pattern was that it seemed to be too fond of spatial control and made too big allowances because of that - but I really want to play more games before commenting any more - and this week I won't have much time :) - laterz It isn't the first time that some new and very strong program started with miserable results at my computers - I had this with nearly all Shredders (strange coincidence) - their results always got better when they were warmed up and felt more at home on my computers :) Just as you I really have a _very_ positive first impression of the opening book though. Peter
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.