Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Company politics - intel c++ for computerchess sucks at K7

Author: Frank Phillips

Date: 09:57:58 05/10/02

Go up one level in this thread


On May 09, 2002 at 22:24:15, Vincent Diepeveen wrote:

>On May 09, 2002 at 10:27:34, Frank Phillips wrote:
>
>>Intel Linux compiler version 6 is faster (about 5%) than Intel version 5 for me,
>>on a K7 1.4GHz (non XP) - Mandrake 8.2 with icc -O3 -ipo -prof_use
>
>and if you try on windows intel c++ 5.0.1 next:
>  CFLAGS    = -O3 -G6 -Qaxi -Qxi -Gr -Qprof_genx
>
>then delete object files and try again:
> CFLAGS    = -O3 -G6 -Qaxi -Qxi -Gr -Qprof_use
>
>How's its speed then?

I do not have the Windows version.

>
>this should speed you up huge, as you're not using G6 above nor Qaxi nor GR.
>
>ipo was producing buggy code for me.

ipo used to crash in version 5 but seems to work in version 6.

>
>Is the 6.0 compile producing same output like 5.01?

The executable is bigger, about 20% if I recall correctly, so I guess it is not
producing the same code.

>
>>I applaud Intel for releasing their compiler free of charge. Next time chips
>>from the two manufacturers are close in price and performance I will chose Intel
>>as a consequence.
>
>Minority viewpoint in this world, nevertheless more common in this forum :)

I find it hard to critise Intel for giving me such a good compiler for free. GCC
produces almost a 30% slower executable for me....sadly.

>
>>Frank
>
>by the way, is your engine using bitboards Frank?

Yes: mixture of bitboard and offset array.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.