Author: Mark Young
Date: 04:33:31 07/26/98
Go up one level in this thread
On July 26, 1998 at 06:37:57, Amir Ban wrote: > >Did Anand have a good alternative to the critical 16...Bd6 ? Maybe not: > >16... f6 17. Qh5+ is losing > >16... Be7 17. Bg5 Rf8 is horrible > >16... cxd4 17. cxd4 Be7 18. Rc1 Qd8 19. Nxf7 Bxe4 20. Qxe4 Kxf7 21. 0-0 is >clearly in white's favor. > >16... cxd4 17. cxd4 Qc2 is the only reasonable alternative. The continuations >are unclear & complicated, but look more in white's favour: > > 18. Be3 f5 19. Qh5+ g6 20. Nxg6 hxg6 21. Qxh8 and black can continue Qc3+ >or Qxe4. > > or > > 18. d5 Bxa3 19. 0-0 (or even Rxa3) > > or > > 18. d5 exd5 19. exd5 Be7 > > >Most people assume that Anand spent 18 minutes to work out that Bd6 works >perfectly. He may have spent those 18 minutes to consider just how bad those >alternatives are, then crossed his fingers and played Bd6. > >Amir If true then Anand was lucky to win the second game. Is there a solid line of play to win against Bd6 that Rebel 10 missed? And how would you rate rebel 10 in the two games with GM Anand? If it is inappropriate to ask about the strength of a competing program I withdraw that question.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.