Author: Jorge
Date: 07:45:34 05/14/02
Go up one level in this thread
On May 13, 2002 at 20:36:44, John Reynolds wrote: > > > Firstly, I have heard reports of Phony Hiarcs being passed around, I suspect >there are some people testing the Psuedo Hiarcs. My own results have shown >Hiarcs8 to be exceptionally strong, comparable to Fritz for sure. Number 2: It >may be that the book testers are using with Hiarcs is Bad, Personally I am using >a 500 mb book I downloaded from the net. There is no other Logical explanation >for all these negative Posts. Also it is possible that the program is not being >tested at longer time controls, all my games are atleast game in 60. Any >thoughts? I am currently running a matches between Hiarcs732 vs. 8.0, using Powerbook2001 (power.ctg) for both engines at 3'/game on one computer, and 2'+10"/game on another. So far, it is pretty even at 3' time (130 games so far), but at 2' 10" control, Hiarcs8 has a much wider margin of wins! I will post the results later, after 200 games are played. regards, jorge
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.